{"id":265,"date":"2011-11-27T21:03:48","date_gmt":"2011-11-27T21:03:48","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/ejssm.org\/archives\/?p=265"},"modified":"2022-04-28T06:38:40","modified_gmt":"2022-04-28T06:38:40","slug":"vol-6-7-2011","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/ejssm.org\/archives\/2011\/vol-6-7-2011\/","title":{"rendered":"Vol 6-7 2011"},"content":{"rendered":"<h4>A Radar-Based Assessment of the Detectability of Giant Hail<\/h4>\n<p><em>Scott F Blair, Derek R Deroche, Joshua M Boustead, Jared W Leighton, Brian L Barjenbruch, William P Gargan<\/em><\/p>\n<h4>Abstract<\/h4>\n<p>The occurrence of giant hail, defined as hail \u2265102 mm (4.00 in) in diameter, is a relatively rare phenomenon, accounting for less than 1% of all hail reports in the United States.\u00a0 Despite the infrequent nature of these events, hail of this magnitude has the potential to cause extreme damage to property and a substantial threat to exposed life.\u00a0 The short-term prediction of these events has been challenging.\u00a0 For giant hail since 2005, only 7% of convective warnings and severe-weather statements issued by the National Weather Service (NWS) accurately predicted a maximum hail size \u2265102 mm prior to the report, with an average underestimated size error of 55.6 mm (2.19 in).<\/p>\n<p>The objectives of this study are to determine the detectability of giant hail in convective storms and to improve advanced recognition of these events during NWS warning operations.\u00a0 A total of 568 giant-hail reports, gathered over a 15-y period from 1 January 1995 through 31 December 2009 throughout the contiguous United States, served as the primary database for the research. Weather Surveillance Radar-1988 Doppler (WSR-88D) data and North American Regional Reanalysis (NARR) environmental data were collected for each case.\u00a0 Several radar signatures were examined to assess their utility in discriminating storms most favorable for giant hail.\u00a0 It was found that 99% of the storms were supercells with well-organized structure.\u00a0 Giant-hail producing storms were characterized by median values of rotational velocities of 24 m s<sup>-1<\/sup>\u00a0(47 kt), storm-top divergence magnitudes of 72 m s<sup>-1<\/sup>\u00a0(140\u00a0kt), and 50-dB<em>Z<\/em>\u00a0and 60-dB<em>Z<\/em>\u00a0echo heights of 13 100 m (43 000 ft) and 10 600 m (34 800 ft) respectively.\u00a0 Vertically integrated liquid water (VIL)-based products, maximum reflectivity within the storm, and reflectivity within the preferred hail-growth zone showed little to no skill in discriminating between giant hail and smaller hail sizes.<\/p>\n<p>Full Text: <a href=\"https:\/\/ejssm.org\/archives\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/09\/vol6-7.pdf\">PDF<\/a><\/p>\n<p>Citation:<br \/>\nBlair, S. F., D. R. Deroche, J. M. Boustead, J. W. Leighton, B. L. Barjenbruch, and W. P. Gargan, 2011:\u00a0A radar-based assessment of the detectability of giant hail.\u00a0<i>Electronic J. Severe Storms Meteor.<\/i>,\u00a0<b>6<\/b>\u00a0(7), 1-30.<\/p>\n<p>Keywords:<br \/>\nhail, radar tools, remote sensing, supercells, operational forecasting, reanalysis<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<h5>A Radar-Based Assessment of the Detectability of Giant Hail<\/h5>\n<p><i>Scott F Blair, Derek R Deroche, Joshua M Boustead, Jared W Leighton, Brian L Barjenbruch, William P Gargan<\/i><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_genesis_hide_title":false,"_genesis_hide_breadcrumbs":false,"_genesis_hide_singular_image":false,"_genesis_hide_footer_widgets":false,"_genesis_custom_body_class":"","_genesis_custom_post_class":"","_genesis_layout":"","footnotes":""},"categories":[2],"tags":[16,21,24,32,28,14],"class_list":{"0":"post-265","1":"post","2":"type-post","3":"status-publish","4":"format-standard","6":"category-article","7":"tag-hail","8":"tag-operational-forecasting","9":"tag-radar-tools","10":"tag-reanalysis","11":"tag-remote-sensing","12":"tag-supercells","13":"entry"},"featured_image_src":null,"featured_image_src_square":null,"author_info":{"display_name":"Elke","author_link":"https:\/\/ejssm.org\/archives\/author\/elke\/"},"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/ejssm.org\/archives\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/265","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/ejssm.org\/archives\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/ejssm.org\/archives\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/ejssm.org\/archives\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/ejssm.org\/archives\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=265"}],"version-history":[{"count":4,"href":"https:\/\/ejssm.org\/archives\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/265\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":945,"href":"https:\/\/ejssm.org\/archives\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/265\/revisions\/945"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/ejssm.org\/archives\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=265"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/ejssm.org\/archives\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=265"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/ejssm.org\/archives\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=265"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}